Dealing With a New Fiscal Reality

In a previous blog, we mentioned State Auditor Dave Yost’s new website, “SkinnyOhio.”

“Essentially, the website is designed to be a one stop shop for local communities looking for best practices in order to reduce their costs of doing business through collaboration.”

This was just a warm up for Yost. The Auditor has made many headlines like this one from the Columbus Dispatch.

“With local governments facing sharp reductions in state aid, state Auditor Dave Yost is pushing for proposals that would make it easier for townships and counties to merge.

Yost, testifying before the Senate Finance Committee about the proposed two-year budget, said consolidating government entities would save tax dollars by reducing staff and service costs.

His plan would allow township boards of trustees to approve mergers of two or more townships with a two-thirds vote. Voters could seek a referendum if they want to contest the action.

His plan also would give voters expanded rights to initiate petitions seeking the merger of two or more counties.”

This is big stuff that Yost is talking about. While many local governments are still very important and responsive to their constituents, the fact is that we are entering a new era with a vastly different fiscal reality than many are used to.

By offering tools to various local entities and, just as importantly, to local residents tired of huge taxation burdens, the Auditor seems to be taking a bold step into the 21st Century.

The vestiges of Ohio’s past in no way guarantee a positive future. The economy of the last decade in Ohio is proof enough of that. Its time to get creative about what Ohio is going to look like, not only from a Columbus based perspective, but from the point of view of the smallest of its villages.

Greg R. Lawson

About Greg R. Lawson

Greg R. Lawson is the Statehouse Liaison and Policy Analyst with the Buckeye Institute
This entry was posted in Local Government. Bookmark the permalink.

One comment on “Dealing With a New Fiscal Reality

  1. Peter on said:

    Mergers and consolidations of the type State Auditor Dave Yost is talking about are all well & good. But beware, there are other types of regionalization out there that are a nightmare.

    Specifically, I’m thinking of the Regional Prosperity Initiative (RPI).

    RPI is the brainchild of the liberal Brookings Institute and is a radical social engineering effort to plan growth, infrastructure projects, housing, (and who knows what else) on a multi-county level.

    For example, RPI propose throwing their regionalization scheme over the entire NE Ohio area. How to do it? Some in the RPI office suggest that towns be included in the RPI on a countywide vote. So, even if your town does not want in ,but your county votes yes, you’re in RPI. Other ideas is to get RPI enacted via legislation in Columbus.

    Opponents of RPI see much of it as a means to transfer even more funds from the suburbs to cities. I agree with that view.

    Regionalization is a generic word. Some regionalization efforts may makes sense (and must be voluntary) while other need to be vigorously opposed. RPI is one of the latter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

HTML tags are not allowed.