Can Ohio Learn from a Reviving Motor City?

We are on the verge of a very important election.  Irrespective of the outcome on Issue 2, the debate over collective bargaining, unions, and how government functions is not going to go away.

In the wake of movements like “Occupy Wall Street,” it is apparent that there are those that think that if we go back to the old, “Blue State,” statist approach, all will be fine.  The middle class will not be squeezed.  For them, if there is to be any squeezing, it will end up being those “rich fat cats” that occupy the corporate boardroom.  They will pay more in taxes and the status quo can continue unimpeded.

For those that believe this, a recent story from the Economist should make him or her reconsider.

The piece outlines how Detroit, long seen as a rusting hulk that recalled the Midwest’s past industrial glory days, could be on the verge of a renaissance.  However, this renaissance is not due to heavy embracing of a “Blue State” model of pro-government, pro-union, pro-tax, and pro-regulation policies.  Rather, it is driven by some of the kind same people being demonized by “Occupy Wall Street.”

From 2000 to 2010 Detroit lost an astounding 25 percent of its population as the automotive industry ran into a myriad of challenges.  This led to tragic results,

There are now about 60,000 empty houses in Detroit, says its mayor, Dave Bing. Vacant properties are magnets for crime, and once one house in a block has been vandalised, and often set alight, the problem tends to spread. As property prices in the city collapse, so too does the rate-base that is used to collect the taxes that go to pay for schools; so the schools decline too…”

Unsurprisingly, this massive loss in population has led to declines in property values.  Ordinarily, this is very bad news.  Yet in Detroit’s case, it seems that what usually is bad may also be a new foundation for growth.

The reason is that the cheaper prices for office, retail, and residential space are beginning to draw entrepreneurial-minded people in to the city’s downtown core from which many had been fleeing for decades.  As the Economist states,

“The most remarkable of these is Dan Gilbert. A 49-year-old native of Detroit whose motto is “We can do well by doing good”, Mr Gilbert is reshaping Detroit’s centre. Last year he moved his main business, Quicken Loans, the largest internet mortgage company in America, from the quiet suburbs into a building on Campus Martius park, the heart of downtown. His 1,700 staff there were joined, earlier this month, by another 2,000 people whom he moved into a second building nearby.”

Of course, while these kinds of moves can help revitalize areas that had long since decayed, it is not enough to simply rearrange chairs.  That’s why Detroit’s “TechTown” is another ray of light for the troubled city and one that is slowly, but thus far surely growing the economic pie.

“David Egner, who runs Detroit’s New Economy Initiative (founded three years ago with a $100m budget by a group of ten non-profit organisations) has high hopes for TechTown, a business accelerator his organisation helped set up on the corridor to take advantage of Wayne State University, the Detroit Medical Centre and the Henry Ford Hospital…

It has 250 businesses on its books, and a waiting list of 40 would-be start-ups; it is considering a number of additional buildings for expansion”

Even education in Detroit is being helped out by private foundations, churches, and other philanthropic efforts,

“Half of Detroit’s children now escape the poorly run and poorly funded public schools, because of an explosion in the number of independent charter schools, religious foundations and rules that let pupils attend schools in neighboring suburbs.“ 

There is a long ways to go before Detroit can really say it has emerged from the dark cloud of the past few decades.  However, Walter Russell Mead, who blogged about this story, has it 100 percent right when he states,

“This is very good news, and it is refreshing to see that people are still searching for solutions in a city that many had left for dead. It is interesting to note, however, that in one of the bluest of blue-model cities, the government is responsible for so few of these changes.”

Dan Gilbert is a big time business professional and multiple private foundations have played the key roles in establishing “TechCity” and getting charter schools off the ground.  This is not a government focused, Keynesian effort at pump priming.  It is a bottom up reimagining by people and groups willing to put skin in the game in order to make a difference.
If a paragon of the “Blue State” model like Detroit can undergo this type of transformation, other rust belt states and cities should take notice.

Ohio is slowly attempting to do this and we’ll see on November 8 how close, or how far, it is from being realized.  It would be striking if in ten years from now Detroit has become a beacon of light while Ohio persists in stagnation.

Greg R. Lawson

About Greg R. Lawson

Greg R. Lawson is the Statehouse Liaison and Policy Analyst with the Buckeye Institute
This entry was posted in Economy. Bookmark the permalink.

One comment on “Can Ohio Learn from a Reviving Motor City?

  1. Whether SB5 wins or loses on November 8, several facts remain unaltered.

    First, the public-sector unions are on the defensive. If they defeat SB5, it merely means they dodged a bullet — for the time being. And if even if it loses, SB5 has first the first time shed a light on the excesses by the government unions. Before this, it was accepted conventional wisdom that the government work force 1) was made up of near altruistic public servants and 2) was underpaid relative to the private sector. Both these propositions are being revealed to be false in the light of the SB5 debate. The genie is out of the bottle, and the unioin bosses and all the union men cannot put the genie back in again.

    And should SB5 lose, it will not negate what was said above. That’s because changing public opinion is like trying to turn an ocean liner around; it takes time. Without a doubt, even by defeating SB5, the public-sector unions are far, far weaker than they ever imagined they could be just a few years ago.

    Second, the economic/financial conditions both here in Ohio and in the U.S. will not have changed as a result of November 8. The huge projected deficits for municipalities and school districts remain. Without SB5 reform, these deficits will have to be faced with either tax increases or cuts. And since the public’s appetite for a heavier tax burden is nil, one can expect significant shrinkage in the government employment roles.

    To try and mitigate this, the public sector unions will have to immediately go into a continuous campaign mode across the state for increased taxes. Good luck with that. It’s far easier to fool the public into voting against SB5 than it is to get them to vote for one levy after another.

    And since seniority rules the union universe, it will be the young unionists who will suffer. This in-and-of-itself could lead to a further weakening of the highly touted, but much suspected, union solidarity.

    And finally, there is the macro-force. That is, it is the private sector which generates the wealth upon which the blue model is built. And sitting on top of the blue model are the public-sector unions. Due to forces like globalization and technology advances, the private sector is hurting and no longer able to support the unprecedented privileges that government employees have grown accustomed to. Reality dictates that the public-sector must diminish. And it will.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

HTML tags are not allowed.