What do the Wisconsin results mean for Ohio?

This is a question a lot of people are asking themselves in light of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s strong victory in the recall election Tuesday night. I offered some thoughts and reactions for ABC 6/Fox 28 here in Columbus yesterday (you can watch the video here).

I think one easy takeaway is that the basics still matter. Fundraising, voter turnout systems, a highly motivated base and a favorable calendar all still matter. Governor Walker raised a lot of money, motivated his supporters and ran a disciplined and effective campaign that won the turnout battle. He also had the added benefit of running on his record a year after the legislation passed and against a specific opponent.

But I also think the recall sends the message that public sector unions are not invincible. No matter how you slice it a loss, is a loss, is a loss. When Governor Walker embarked on the fundamental reforms needed to get control of Wisconsin’s budget and plan for a sustainable future he ran smack into the implacable opposition of public sector unions and their allies. They immediately set about to overturn this necessary reform by removing Walker from office. Many assumed they would be successful.

But what Tuesday’s results showed is that this opposition can be weathered and ultimately defeated. Walker stood his ground, built a large coalition and network of support, and used that foundation to run a focused and strategic campaign that communicated what was at stake to persuadable citizens.

This is a lesson worth remembering. Nothing is inevitable.

Which is good news because, despite the lingering effects of Issue 2, Ohio’s structural problems are not going to go away. An outdated, industrial, big government economic model has led to stagnation and growth deficits.

  • public sector compensation system based on tenure and political power rather than talent and success still drives an unsustainable budget process, and poor service delivery, from the local level up to the Statehouse;
  • Gold plated pension benefits, and a system where all the risk is on the taxpayer, have created $70 billion and counting in unfunded liabilities.

Ohio must begin to address these issues if it is to be competitive and avoid the crippling crisis griping governments from Illinois to California to Greece and Spain.

The answer lies in a sustained education, communication and engagement process that helps Ohioans understand why reform is in their best interest and will lead to better lives for their families and businesses; it will mean more jobs, better services and stronger communities. And this effort will require building a broad based coalition from across the state to counter the still-powerful groups that insist on the status quo.

We at the Buckeye Institute are committed to researching and communicating solutions to these fundamental problems. We are committed to working as part of a larger coalition to build support for reform and to counter the misrepresentation and fear mongering that so often is involved in these types of debates.

We come to work everyday seeking ways to engage Ohio citizens and policy makers and to communicate the urgent need for reform. The events in Wisconsin prove that success is possible, that bold reform can succeed.

Nothing is inevitable. We can win. We can increase freedom and opportunity in Ohio.

It won’t be easy, change never is, but it is what we must do to put Ohio back on the path to growth and prosperity – to build a future for our children and grandchildren.

This entry was posted in Government, Labor, Pensions, Public Sector Reform and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 comments on “What do the Wisconsin results mean for Ohio?

  1. Peter on said:

    Wisconsin shows at least two other things.

    First, Ohio needs SB-B, Rev. B, as soon as possible.

    Second, when public-sector labor reform is next presented, the GOP and business community has to fight for it from the get-go. This did NOT happen with the SB-5 referendum. The GOP sat on its hands and let Big Labor propaganda go for too long before responding.

    The fact is also that John Kasich was lukewarm for the SB-5 reform as it was much more a creature of the conservative legislature than it was the governor’s.

    This has to change. Public sector unions are destructive to Ohio and must be muzzled. The common good requires all hands on deck, just like the GOP did in Wisconsin

  2. Bob Magee on said:

    I believe it shows people aren’t interested in a recall unless the office holder is corrupt, or has done harm.Even though I am pro-union, this was a stupid waste of money.
    Peter, in regards to your comment about Kasich & SB5, it was Kasich’s idea, through ALEC, that put it on the ballot in the first place. The people of Ohio were smart enough to realize the bill went way to far, and rightly defeated it. Kasich acknowledged this in his concession speech that evening.

  3. Thomas W. Billing on said:

    Kasich attempted to come into the governor’s chair like Rambo with guns blazing against anyone not part of the right wing rich elite that he supports, and who bought his way in with ads. His attempt to destroy unions was unfortunate. I am a progressive who does NOT support labor but also does not support the rich getting richer and that is what will happen when unions are muzzled in Ohio. Is there anyone who wonders why the population of this state continues to decrease?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

HTML tags are not allowed.